Why combining medicines in Ayurveda is a bad idea


Combination therapy is the concurrent administration of two or more active compounds for disease treatment. It is a well-recognized strategy in modern pharmacology. In conventional medicine, combination therapy is strategically employed to enhance clinical outcomes by optimizing therapeutic efficacy, mitigating the risk of dose-dependent toxicity, and minimizing the emergence of drug resistance. 


The therapeutic efficacy of such an intervention is influenced by multiple factors, including the quality and standardization of formulations, dosage precision, individual patient characteristics, and the synergistic potential of combined therapies. 

However, in the context of Ayurveda, establishing a definitive advantage through such a combination process remains a complex challenge, particularly in clinical settings.


Firstly, the bioactive profile of medicinal herbs used is influenced by factors such as growth conditions, seasonal variations, part used, and preparation methods, leading to distinct pharmacological outcomes even within classical formulations. 


Secondly, Ayurveda formulations are complex and characterized by multi-ingredient compositions with diverse phytoconstituents within a single herb when compared to the conventional single-drug approach. This complexity poses significant challenges for standardization, analytical characterization, and pharmacokinetic profiling, making quality control and reproducibility critical concerns in Ayurveda-based combination therapies.


Likewise, the selection of Anupana (vehicle) in Ayurveda plays a pivotal role in modulating the pharmacological activity of a formulation. Anupana acts as a bioenhancer, contributing to the multifaceted effects of polyherbal formulations, bringing further variation in Ayurveda-based combination therapies.


Presently, going forward with combination therapy in Ayurveda carries various risks. One concern is the possibility of exceeding the recommended dosage threshold when the same ingredient is present in multiple formulations used concurrently, particularly in herbo-mineral preparations where a single mineral component may be a common ingredient in two or more polyherbal formulations. 


This raises concerns regarding cumulative toxicity, especially for metals and minerals with narrow therapeutic windows.


The potential for herb-herb and herb-drug interactions should also be considered during combination therapies as certain combinations may enhance or inhibit pharmacological effects, potentially leading to suboptimal efficacy or adverse reactions. 


For combination therapy to be efficient in Ayurveda, 

detailed documentation of medicinal formulations, including classical text references, preparation methods, plant sources, and seasonal variations, is crucial. Integrating modern analytical technologies, such as high-performance liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry, can enhance the identification and quantification of active constituents, improving safety and efficacy assessments. 


Collaborative research across Ayurveda practitioners, pharmacologists, and regulatory bodies is necessary to bridge traditional knowledge with modern scientific advancements, enabling a more comprehensive understanding of polyherbal formulations. 


Furthermore, rigorous clinical trials and preclinical studies must validate the therapeutic and safety profiles of these therapies, combining classical Ayurvedic principles with modern pharmacological methodologies to optimize combination therapies while mitigating associated risks.


(Source - Journal of Research in Ayurvedic Sciences) 



Managed by ayurvedamagazine.org

Leave a Comment: